BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-// - ECPv4.9.12//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20180101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20180209T163000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20180209T183000
DTSTAMP:20260724T153327
CREATED:20180124T002731Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20180124T003402Z
UID:18297-1518193800-1518201000@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:“How Classical Chinese Grammar Looked to Its First Native Students”
DESCRIPTION:Early China Seminar Lecture Series: \n“How Classical Chinese Grammar Looked to Its First Native Students”\nSpeaker: David Prager Branner\, independent scholar \n“Yáng Shùdá 楊樹達 (1885–1956) produced some of the fullest and most carefully documented native grammar studies of Classical Chinese on modern principles\, during the first three decades of the Republic of China. He read and critiqued the work of Mǎ Jiànzhōng ⾺建忠 (1845–1900)\, Chén Chéngzé 陳承澤 (1885–1922)\, and Zhāng Shìzhāo 章⼠釗 (1881–1973) with great care and revised their ideas to produce what he considered a more consistent overall grammatical system. But it is strange that Yáng\, with his vast traditional knowledge of Classical Chinese\, did not see some of the simplifications that Structuralist systematic thinking permitted people like George A. Kennedy (1901–60) and Peter Boodberg (1903–72) in the 1940s and 50s. In some cases Yáng and the others considered and rejected ideas that made sense to later scholars\, such as treating adjectives and verbs as a single part of speech. \n“Why they did so is easy to take as proof of the direct influence of European grammar books as models for the early decades of native Chinese grammar — the brothers Mǎ had been educated in Latin as boys\, and Yáng had studied English. I argue that this view is too simple to fit the facts. Perhaps the resistance of Yáng and the others to greater simplification also reveals what as natively literate scholars they thought were irreducible semantic distinctions in Classical Chinese.” \nTime: February 09\, 2017 (4:30-6:30 PM) \nLocation: 403 Kent Hall \n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/how-classical-chinese-grammar-looked-to-its-first-native-students/
LOCATION:403 Kent Hall\, 1140 Amsterdam Ave.\, New York\, NY\, 10027\, United States
CATEGORIES:Lecture
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR