BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-// - ECPv4.9.12//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20220101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220412T113000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220412T133000
DTSTAMP:20261110T162159
CREATED:20220310T054236Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220310T054319Z
UID:29743-1649763000-1649770200@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:Managing Information in the Early People's Republic of China
DESCRIPTION:Event description: \nWith the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949\, the Chinese Communist Party faced a major dilemma: How to obtain useful information\, when public debates are massively restricted and loyalty counts for more than competence? To deal with the problem of information distortion\, the CCP developed a two-pronged approach: Besides public news items that catered towards mobilizational aspects\, it established distinct systems of feedback loops\, which were strictly tasked to separate facts from opinion in order to provide the party leadership with an objective account of domestic and international events. Over time\, a distinct system for controlled circulation of intelligence\, an “information order”\, took shape\, which remained in place until the outbreak of the Cultural Revolution. Despite major disruptions\, the system’s basic structures were kept alive even throughout these tumultuous years and continue to impact the CCP’s information politics until the present. \nModerated by JM Chris Chang\, Asia in Action / Public Humanities Postdoctoral Fellow \nPanelists: \n\nDaniel Leese\, Professor of Modern Chinese History\, University of Freiburg\nCHEN Min\, Researcher\, University of Freiburg\nAmanda Shuman\, Researcher and Lecturer\, University of Freiburg\nLONG Yang\, Postdoctoral Researcher\, University of Freiburg\n\nThis event is the first in a four-part series for WEAI’s Asia in Action workshop series\, “Remapping the Archives: New Histories of the PRC.” \nSeries description: \nIn the present moment\, intensifying historical censorship in China–compounded by the lasting impacts of the pandemic–has severed access to the archive as we once knew it. The Modern China field has been forced to reckon with the possibility that access to PRC sources may soon become exceptional\, and that its foreclosure portends a post-archival future. What is history without archive\, or archive without history? The purpose of this four-part series is to explore promising responses by several scholars to this crisis in the archive\, both as a means of illuminating new methodological directions in PRC history as well as reexamining perennial historical questions from a new aspect. \nREGISTER \n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/managing-information-in-the-early-peoples-republic-of-china/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220412T190000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220412T200000
DTSTAMP:20261110T162159
CREATED:20220408T160337Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220408T160407Z
UID:30044-1649790000-1649793600@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:The New Era of Shareholder Activism in Japan
DESCRIPTION:\nFeaturing: \nSeth Fischer\nFounder and Chief Investment Officer\, Oasis Management Company Ltd. \nModerator: \nAlicia Ogawa\, Project Director for Japanese Corporate Governance and Stewardship\, Center on Japanese Economy and Business (CJEB)\, Columbia Business School \n\n\nWhat you’ll learn: \n● The wave of shareholder activism in the early 2000s was characterized by public confrontations with Japanese companies and aggressive demands for increased shareholder returns. These were portrayed by the Japanese media as short-term profit-seeking by activists at the expense of stakeholders such as employees and related companies. This era ended with jail sentences for two of the most famous Japanese activists and with the retreat from Japan of foreign activists. What is the legal and regulatory legacy of that era\, for example\, in the case of takeover defenses and collaboration among investors? \n● Why has the attitude of the Japanese government and the general public towards shareholder activism changed? Why did the Abe administration come to embrace activism as a means to restore the country’s economic vitality? How have some of the Japanese corporate scandals\, such as at Olympus and Toshiba\, both affected and legitimized the role of activism in Japan? \n● Activism is now an essential element in helping Japanese companies become more productive\, profitable\, and socially responsible. How have the strategies of activists evolved from the first era of very public confrontation and aggressive demands of their investee companies? What are the tools being used today\, and how have they evolved? What are the most significant obstacles to better shareholder/investor engagements today? \n● ESG activism has been slow to arrive in Japan\, but Mr. Fischer is the author of one of three such shareholder proposals filed in Japan. Groups such as Climate Action 100+ are beginning to engage with Japanese companies\, and global asset managers are making demands such as greater diversity and better management of human capital. What is the future in Japan of ESG activism\, and how well prepared are Japanese companies to respond? \n\n\nAbout the Speaker: \nSeth H. Fischer is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Oasis Management\, a global investment manager headquartered in Hong Kong with offices in Tokyo and the U.S. \nPrior to his founding Oasis in 2002\, Mr. Fischer spent seven years at Highbridge Capital Management\, where he managed the firm’s Asian investment portfolio. \nA proponent of corporate governance reforms across Asia\, he is a frequent speaker on economic and investment panels. Oasis is a signatory to Stewardship Codes in Japan\, Korea and Hong Kong\, and a Sustaining Donor to the Board Director Training Institute of Japan\, as well as a member of the Japan Corporate Governance Network\, the Asia Corporate Governance Association\, the Japan Stewardship Initiative\, and Japan’s 30% Club. \nOasis has privately and publicly engaged with hundreds of Japanese companies on how they can improve their operations and corporate governance\, including Nintendo\, Tokyo Dome\, Sun Corp\, Maeda Road and more. \n\n\nAdmission and Contact: \nThis is a free event. You must register for the webinar to receive the login details. Participants will receive a link to access the live webinar upon registration. \nREGISTER \nIf you have questions about the event\, please contact us at cjeb@gsb.columbia.edu. For more information about other CJEB events\, visit our website or contact cjeb@gsb.columbia.edu. \n\n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/30044/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://ealac.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/https___cdn.evbuc_.com_images_251689459_5815311209_1_original.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220412T193000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220412T203000
DTSTAMP:20261110T162159
CREATED:20220310T054616Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220310T054616Z
UID:29746-1649791800-1649795400@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:Holding the Fort? Japan and Liberal Economic Order in the Indo-Pacific
DESCRIPTION:\n\n\n\n\n\nSpeaker: Saori Katada\, Professor of International Relations\, University of Southern California \nModerator: Daniel Smith\, Gerald L. Curtis Visiting Associate Professor of Modern Japanese Politics and Foreign Policy\, Columbia University \nHow can Japan\, a systemically important middle power\, hold the fort of liberal economic order? During the last ten years\, the Japanese government has actively engaged in geoeconomic strategy to strengthen regional institutions and high-standard economic rules in the Indo-Pacific. Now\, this strategy is challenged\, on the one hand\, in the face of disruption imposed by the US Trump administration and the Biden administration’s weak economic commitment in the region. On the other\, Covid-19 and associated disruption of supply chains\, as well as China’s weaponization of economic interdependence have added economic security urgency. \nThis event is sponsored by the Weatherhead East Asian Institute. \n\n\n\n\n\n\nContact Information\nJulie Kwan\njk4371@columbia.edu\n\n REGISTER\n\n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/holding-the-fort-japan-and-liberal-economic-order-in-the-indo-pacific/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR