BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-// - ECPv4.9.12//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20220101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220425T120000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220425T133000
DTSTAMP:20261110T183211
CREATED:20220422T154831Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220422T154831Z
UID:30130-1650888000-1650893400@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:China's Colonial Boarding Schools in Tibet
DESCRIPTION:Speakers:\nLhadon Tethong\, Director\, Tibet Action Institute\nFreya Putt\, Director of Strategy\, Tibet Action Institute\nDr. Jia Luo\, University of Toronto\nTenzin Dorjee\, PhD candidate\, Columbia University \nModerator:\nAndy Nathan\, Columbia University \nChinese government policies are forcing three out of every four Tibetan students into a vast network of colonial boarding schools\, separating children as young as four from their parents. According to a recent report by Tibet Action Institute\, the schools are a cornerstone of Xi Jinping’s campaign to supplant Tibetan identity with a homogenous Chinese identity in order to neutralize potential resistance to Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rule. The report\, “Separated From Their Families\, Hidden From the World: China’s Vast System of Colonial Boarding Schools Inside Tibet\,” finds that an estimated 800\,000 to 900\,000 Tibetan students aged six to 18\, as well as an unknown number of four and five-year olds\, are in these state-run schools. This panel will discuss how the schools function as sites for remolding children into Chinese nationals loyal to the CCP. \nSpeakers’ Bios: \nDr. Gyal Lo was born in Amdo\, Tibet (Ch: Gansu). He received his master’s degree from the Tibetan Language and Culture Department at Northwestern University for Nationalities in Lanzhou\, China. In 1995\, he was appointed Assistant Professor in the same department where he taught for the next decade. While in this position\, he did extensive research into the area of Tibetan education and in particular school curriculum development for Tibetans. He later received his master’s and PhD in Educational Sociology from the University of Toronto. He then returned to China where he was appointed a full professor at the Yunnan Normal University Institute for Studies in Education (ISE) from 2017-2020. Dr. Gyal Lo is the author of Social Structuration in Tibetan Society: Education\, Society\, and Spirituality (Lexington Books\, 2021). He was awarded a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC) Fellowship for his research entitled “Culturally-Relevant Education for Minority and Rural Villages in Asia”. \nTenzin Dorjee (Tendor) is Senior Researcher and Strategist at Tibet Action Institute and the Stephanie G. Neuman Fellow in Comparative Defense Studies at Columbia University’s Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies. He is the former executive director of Students for a Free Tibet and the author of The Tibetan Nonviolent Struggle: A Strategic and Historical Analysis. His work has been published in The Washington Post\, Foreign Policy\, the Council on Foreign Relations’ Asia Unbound\, and the Jamestown Foundation’s China Brief. \nFreya Putt is the Director of Strategy at Tibet Action Institute and the lead author of Tibet Action’s report on China’s colonial boarding school system in Tibet\, “Separated from their Families\, Hidden From the World.” She has worked in the Tibet movement for more than twenty years\, with short breaks to work for other social justice and environmental organizations. She holds a masters degree from Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs. Freya coordinated the global Tibet movement’s campaign to spotlight Tibet’s occupation and pressure the Chinese leadership through the Beijing 2008 Olympics. \nLhadon Tethong is co-founder and director of Tibet Action Institute where she leads a team of technologists and rights advocates in developing open-source technologies\, strategies and training programs for Tibetans\, and others living under extreme repression. Formerly the Executive Director of Students for a Free Tibet International (2002-2009)\, Lhadon led the high-profile global campaign to condemn China’s rule of Tibet in the lead-up to and during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. She was awarded the first annual James Lawson Award for Nonviolent Achievement by the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict in 2011\, and accepted the Democracy Award from the National Endowment for Democracy on behalf of Tibet Action Institute in 2018. \nThis event is sponsored by the Weatherhead East Asian Institute and co-sponsored by the Institute for Religion\, Culture and Public Life\, the Institute for the Study of Human Rights\, and the Tibet Action Institute. \nContact Information\nJulie Kwan\njk4371@columbia.edu \nREGISTER \n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/chinas-colonial-boarding-schools-in-tibet/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://ealac.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/unnamed-1-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220425T163000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220425T180000
DTSTAMP:20261110T183211
CREATED:20220310T055104Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220310T055104Z
UID:29751-1650904200-1650909600@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:"On China" With C&WP Fellow Justin Canfil
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Justin Canfil\, Columbia University \nSpeaker Bio: \nI am a political scientist (PhD Columbia) whose interests span international security\, emerging technologies\, and law. My research leverages game theory\, computerized text analysis\, archival research\, and survey-experimental methods to provide empirical traction on questions about how states use legal and foreign policy instruments to get what they want in the technology space. I am broadly interested in security studies\, strategic competition\, and cyber conflict. \nAt present\, I hold concurrent postdoctoral appointments with the Tufts Fletcher Cybersecurity Program\, the Harvard Belfer Center\, and the Harvard-Columbia China and the World Program. My research on the law and politics of militarily impactful technologies has been supported by the Fulbright Program\, the National Science Foundation\, the US Department of State (Title VIII)\, the Department of Education (FLAS)\, and other major sources. \n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis event is sponsored by the Columbia-Harvard China and the World Program and cosponsored by the Weatherhead East Asian Institute. \n\n\n\n\n\n REGISTER\n\n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/on-china-with-cwp-fellow-justin-canfil/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220425T163000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220425T180000
DTSTAMP:20261110T183211
CREATED:20220408T161253Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220408T161253Z
UID:30052-1650904200-1650909600@ealac.columbia.edu
SUMMARY:Technological Contestation in International Law and Arms Control
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Justin Canfil \nFor status quo powers interested in stabilizing the security environment\, informally adapting existing law is easier and quicker than formally bargaining over new law. But policymakers and pundits routinely bemoan the inability of “thin” international institutions like arms control — where the stakes for war and peace are highest — to keep pace with technological change. Opportunistic actors\, it is believed\, see technology as both the means and motive to evade their institutional commitments\, especially in institutions that lack a standing bureaucracy or dispute settlement mechanism. In practice\, however\, many of our “thinnest” institutions have proven remarkably resilient to technological breakthroughs that disproportionately benefit certain states. Controversy over emerging technologies is certainly common\, but why is it not ubiquitous? \nTo answer this question\, legal professionals in the US and China are commissioned to write long-form advisory briefs about a legally questionable satellite technology. Decisionmakers routinely rely on legal experts to make determinations about what kinds of technologies are compliant with international obligations\, though the training and role of these experts varies by country. Technological novelty\, the linguistic specificity of a reference law\, and fiduciary incentives are randomly varied along 2^3 factorial-controlled conditions. In the US sample\, statistical and text analytic results strongly support the theory that specificity\, though better at limiting deviations in the near-term\, performs worse in environments where technology moves quickly and unpredictably. Since the US has traditionally advocated for more specificity in international law\, the findings help explain US behavior toward recent Chinese technological advances. Pending results from a second wave\, likely implications for China’s approach are discussed. \nJustin is a political scientist (PhD Columbia) whose interests span international security\, emerging technologies\, and law. My research leverages game theory\, computerized text analysis\, archival research\, and survey-experimental methods to provide empirical traction on questions about how states use legal and foreign policy instruments to get what they want in the technology space. I am broadly interested in security studies\, strategic competition\, and cyber conflict. At present\, he hold concurrent postdoctoral appointments with the Tufts Fletcher Cybersecurity Program\, the Harvard Belfer Center\, and the Harvard-Columbia China and the World Program. My research on the law and politics of militarily impactful technologies has been supported by the Fulbright Program\, the National Science Foundation\, the US Department of State (Title VIII)\, the Department of Education (FLAS)\, and other major sources. \nREGISTER \n
URL:https://ealac.columbia.edu/event/technological-contestation-in-international-law-and-arms-control/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://ealac.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Justin-Canfil.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR