• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

  • ABOUT
    • Greetings from the Department Chair
    • Department History
    • News
    • Affiliates
    • Support
    • Contact EALAC
  • PEOPLE
    • Faculty
    • Administration
    • Graduate Students
    • Recent Alumni
  • PROGRAMS
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Language Programs
    • Academic Year 2025-2026 Courses
  • EVENTS
  • SUPPORT

China

Tagged With: archaeology, China

Early China Seminar Lecture Series: “Technological Changes on the Proto-Silk Roads: The Tao River Archaeology Project, Gansu, China”

Early China Seminar Lecture Series:

“Technological Changes on the Proto-Silk Roads: The Tao River Archaeology Project, Gansu, China”

Rowan Flad, Harvard University
Friday, March 23, 2018
4:30-6:30 PM
Seminar Room 3 & 4, Faculty House

Around 4000 years ago a series of changes in subsistence and craft technologies conspired to radically transform material culture and human lives along the “proto-Silk Roads” in Northwest China. The most significant changes occurred during the Qijia Culture period (ca. 4200-3600 calBP). Bronze metallurgy became increasingly important, ceramic technology underwent radical changes, and new crops and animals moved in from the west and north. These changes laid the foundation for the Chinese Bronze Age.

The Tao River valley is a major tributary to the Yellow River and is located at the confluence of the historical networks of interaction and exchange that comprise the “Silk Roads,” which include connections through the Hexi Corridor to Central Asia, as well as the “Southern Silk Road” involving connections along the eastern fringes of the Tibetan Plateau south towards Southeast Asia. The river valley is rich in sites dating to the entire sequence of regional archaeological cultures that comprise the prehistoric chronology in the region: Yangshao culture (ca. 7000-5000 BP); Majiayao, Bansan and Machang “Painted-pottery” cultures (ca. 5200-4000 BP); Qijia culture; and the post-Qijia, Xindian (3600-2600 BP) and Siwa (ca. 3300-2500 BP) cultures. Furthermore, the type sites for many of these cultural traditions, including Majiayao, Qijia, Xindian and Siwa, are all found along this river. The Tao River Archaeological Project (TRAP) explores fundamental questions about the nature of technology and technological change and the relationships between technological and social change in this region. The project builds on extensive preliminary work from 2012-2015 and involves further survey and excavations in 2016 and 2017.

03/23/2018 by admin

Tagged With: China, Chinese, Chinese Literature

Wenzao Wu & Bingxin Xie

Wenzao Wu & Bingxin Xie

Binggen Wang, President of Bingxin Research Society, Founding President of Bingxin Literature Museum

Monday, March 5, 2018
2:00-4:00 PM
403 Kent Hall

This talk will be given in Chinese.

Sponsors and Cosponsors:
Confucius Institute at Columbia University
Columbia University Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures
Columbia Global Centers|Beijing

03/05/2018 by admin

Tagged With: China, Chinese Literature

Early China Seminar Lecture Series: Notes on the Note (ji 記) in Early Chinese Manuscripts: Between Administration and Affect

Early China Seminar Lecture Series:
Notes on the Note (ji 記) in Early Chinese Manuscripts: Between Administration and Affect

Luke Habberstad, University of Oregon

Seminar Co-Chairs:

Jue Guo, Barnard College, Columbia University
Roderick Campbell, Institute for the Study of Ancient World, New York University

March 2rd, 2018 (Friday)
4:30-6:30pm
1754 Board Room, Faculty House
64 Morningside Drive

Students of early Chinese manuscript culture continue to debate various typologies of the ever-growing corpus of excavated evidence. Many, however, at least implicitly agree on a distinction between “administrative” documents on the one hand and “literary” or “philosophical” manuscripts on the other, and correspondingly focus on the different conventions that characterized both categories. The distinction is by no means unhelpful or wholly inaccurate, but it nonetheless raises the question: Are all “administrative” documents bereft of “literary” affectations?

The paper explores this and related questions through an analysis of excavated and received examples, primarily from the Qin and Western Han, of the “note” (ji 記), a murky category that encompassed everything from formal government orders and reports to messages and letters exchanged between people. At the same time, our sources do allow us to trace a transformation in the ji from pre-imperial to early imperial periods: initially referring to annalistic records maintained in state archives, or supposedly ancient texts containing authoritative knowledge, by the Han period the dominant meaning of the ji was “note” or “letter.” Even if the emergence of commentarial practices had a role in this transformation, this essay argues that the expansion and solidification of different types of administrative texts, including “notes” that allowed for more casual orders, efficient communication, and affective exchanges, also played a role. Without calling for the abandonment of the “administrative” vs. “literary” rubric, the paper nonetheless encourages an examination of convention and rhetorical affect in texts central to quotidian government operations in order to better understand key changes in the early Chinese literature.

Co-sponsored by The Tang Center for Early China, Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, and The Columbia University Seminars, Columbia University

03/02/2018 by admin

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to Next Page »

Before Footer

EALAC – Columbia University
407 Kent Hall 1140 Amsterdam Ave.
MC 3907  New York, NY 10027
tel:212.854.5027

Footer

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • ABOUT
  • PEOPLE
  • PROGRAMS
  • EVENTS
  • SUPPORT

Copyright © 2025 · Columbia University Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures

Copyright © 2025 · EALAC on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in